This personal injury case concerns the admissibility of partially controverted affidavits offered to prove the reasonableness and necessity of medical expenses.

The central issue in this case is whether a post-divorce enforcement order that applied an agreed divorce decree's damages provision impermissibly changed the substantive division of property after the trial court's plenary power had expired.

At issue in this case is whether the trial court clearly abused its discretion in granting Real Parties' (Shah's) motion to disqualify Relators' (Zaidi's) counsel.

At issue in this case is whether a state tax on tobacco products, defined as products "made of tobacco or a tobacco substitute," applies to oral nicotine products.

This case presents two issues regarding school board members' statutory rights to access district information and to obtain attorney's fees under the Texas Education Code.

This restricted appeal raises personal jurisdiction and substituted service-of-process issues in a dispute about payment under a contract for moving services.

This case concerns the propriety of a trial court's jury instruction on spoliation of evidence.

At issue is whether an oil and gas operator breached its agreement with a water pipeline operator by buying water from other suppliers.

An issue in this case is whether a defendant can settle tort claims and then seek recovery under a contractual comparative-indemnity provision.

The principal issue in this case is whether the trial court properly extended its jurisdiction over a parental rights-termination suit past the Family Code's automatic dismissal deadline.

At issue in this case is whether a plaintiff may cure a defective petition under Chapter 150 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code through amendment, or whether the defect may only be cured by filing a new action.

These petitions concern the statutory requirements for waiving a groundwater district’s immunity under the Texas Water Code.

These petitions concern the statutory requirements for waiving a groundwater district’s immunity under the Texas Water Code.

At issue in this case is whether a real property owner may be granted injunctive relief to abate a nuisance even though the relevant statute of limitations has expired for each of its claims for monetary relief.

The issue in this case is whether the State is immune from a suit to repurchase property acquired through eminent domain.

At issue in this case is whether an attorney representing himself is subject to the disciplinary rule barring attorneys from communicating directly with parties who are represented by counsel.

This petition primarily concerns whether Lyford Consolidated Independent School District and Willacy County taxpayers have standing to challenge South Texas Independent School District's changed use of ad valorem tax revenue.

The issue in this case is whether participating in an organized 5K race constitutes "recreation" under the Recreational Use Statute.