At issue in this case is whether the statutory immunity afforded to a contractor who constructs a highway "for the Texas Department of Transportation" requires contractual privity between that contractor and the Department.

This case is about whether the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality met a deadline to request an Attorney General decision under the Public Information Act and whether the Commission must disclose the requested information regardless.

This petition concerns whether a trust's shareholder can assert claims directly against an advisor who contracted with the trust or whether such claims must be brought derivatively.

The issues in this case are whether there was legally sufficient evidence to

At issue in this case is the facial validity of Comptroller Rule 3.591(e)(29), which defines Texas receipts by a place-of-delivery test for the purpose of calculating franchise taxes.

The principal issue in this case is whether there is a statutory right to judicial review of a cease-and-desist order issued by the Texas Medical Board.

The issue in this case is whether the term "windstorm," when undefined in a homeowner's insurance policy, unambiguously includes a tornado.

At issue in this case is whether the agency responsible for maintaining Texas's schedules of controlled substances properly modified certain definitions within those schedules and whether the plaintiffs have standing to enjoin the effect of those modifications.

At issue is whether an economic development agreement violates the Gift Clause found in Article III, Section 52(a) of the Texas Constitution.

The issue in this case is whether the Department of Family and Protective Services abandons its request for termination of parental rights when the Department's caseworker and representative at trial unequivocally testifies that the Department is no longer seeking termination, but the written pleadings and other circumstances at trial indicate that the Department is still seeking termination.

The issue in this mandamus proceeding is whether Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 52.006(b)'s $25 million cap on supersedeas bonds applies per judgment debtor or per judgment.

This personal injury case concerns the admissibility of partially controverted affidavits offered to prove the reasonableness and necessity of medical expenses.

The central issue in this case is whether a post-divorce enforcement order that applied an agreed divorce decree's damages provision impermissibly changed the substantive division of property after the trial court's plenary power had expired.

At issue in this case is whether the trial court clearly abused its discretion in granting Real Parties' (Shah's) motion to disqualify Relators' (Zaidi's) counsel.

At issue in this case is whether a state tax on tobacco products, defined as products "made of tobacco or a tobacco substitute," applies to oral nicotine products.

This case presents two issues regarding school board members' statutory rights to access district information and to obtain attorney's fees under the Texas Education Code.

This restricted appeal raises personal jurisdiction and substituted service-of-process issues in a dispute about payment under a contract for moving services.

This case concerns the propriety of a trial court's jury instruction on spoliation of evidence.

At issue is whether an oil and gas operator breached its agreement with a water pipeline operator by buying water from other suppliers.

An issue in this case is whether a defendant can settle tort claims and then seek recovery under a contractual comparative-indemnity provision.

The principal issue in this case is whether the trial court properly extended its jurisdiction over a parental rights-termination suit past the Family Code's automatic dismissal deadline.

At issue in this case is whether a plaintiff may cure a defective petition under Chapter 150 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code through amendment, or whether the defect may only be cured by filing a new action.

These petitions concern the statutory requirements for waiving a groundwater district’s immunity under the Texas Water Code.

These petitions concern the statutory requirements for waiving a groundwater district’s immunity under the Texas Water Code.

At issue in this case is whether a real property owner may be granted injunctive relief to abate a nuisance even though the relevant statute of limitations has expired for each of its claims for monetary relief.

The issue in this case is whether the State is immune from a suit to repurchase property acquired through eminent domain.

At issue in this case is whether an attorney representing himself is subject to the disciplinary rule barring attorneys from communicating directly with parties who are represented by counsel.

This petition primarily concerns whether Lyford Consolidated Independent School District and Willacy County taxpayers have standing to challenge South Texas Independent School District's changed use of ad valorem tax revenue.

The issue in this case is whether participating in an organized 5K race constitutes "recreation" under the Recreational Use Statute.