At issue in this breach-of-contract case is whether League City's entering into an agreement with Jimmy Changas, Inc., for the construction of a restaurant was a governmental action such that the City is immune from suit or a proprietary action.

There are three primary issues in this case. The first is whether the executor of an estate owed a fiduciary duty to trust beneficiaries. The second issue is whether a decedent's estate was required to, and did, disclose all material facts in connection with a release executed by beneficiaries to the decedent's marital trust. The third issue is whether the trial court abused its discretion in excluding certain financial documents from the summary judgment evidence.

At issue in this parental rights case is whether lower courts interpreted Texas Family Code Section 161.0001(b)(1)(o) in an improperly expansive manner and whether Texas courts have jurisdiction in this case under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act because a New Mexico court initially determined custody in this case.

At issue in this case is whether the parties' lease required Devon Energy to add postproduction costs incurred by third-party purchasers to the gross proceeds from sale before calculating Sheppard's royalty.

The issue in this case is whether claims against an assisted living facility arising out of a resident's fall on the facility's sidewalk, pleaded as premises liability claims, are health care liability claims under the Texas Medical Liability Act and therefore require an expert report.

The issues presented in this case are (1) whether absent class members lack standing to seek civil penalties for 176 alleged violations of the Texas Property Code and (2) whether the court of appeals was required to determine and evaluate the specific elements for the causes of action raised by the class.

This case concerns a dispute between two families, the Mulkeys and the Whites over whether the 1924 deed conveying the estate from the Mulkeys to the Whites, which reserved "one-half of one-eighth" of the mineral rights in the Mulkeys, left the Mulkeys with 1/2 or 1/16 of the mineral estate.

The issues in this case are (1) whether Mike Morath, commissioner of the Texas Education Agency, acted ultra vires by appointing a board of managers to exercise authority over Houston ISD, and by assigning a conservator to oversee Houston ISD's governance; (2) whether Dr. Doris Delaney, the conservator appointed by Commissioner Morath, had the authority to suspend Houston ISD's superintendent search; and (3) whether the trial court must reconsider its temporary injunction under the Texas Education Code as amended by Senate Bill 1365.

The issue in this case is whether section 16.063 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code tolls the statute of limitations on an action when a resident defendant is physically absent from the state even though the defendant is still amenable to service by Texas courts.

This case presents two questions about contract interpretation of oil and gas leases plus another question about tortious interference with contract. First, what is the best reading of this force majeure clause? Second, how does this contract and possibly other oil-and-gas contracts measure how far a "wellbore extends horizontally in the producing formation"? Third, do the facts here present a fact issue about tortious interference in contract?

The issue in this case is whether companies that collect and test employment-related drug-screen samples owe a duty of care to the third-party employees being screened.

This case addresses whether the Texas Citizens Participation Act applies to claims for fraud, civil conspiracy, and breach-of-contract stemming from the sale of a major sports network.

The issue in this case is whether the plaintiff-farmers presented sufficient reliable evidence to survive a no evidence motion for summary judgment that herbicide from the defendant's aerial application caused their alleged injuries.

The issues in this case concern settlement credits, periodic payments, and admission of evidence in the context of a medical malpractice suit alleging negligence against a doctor and his employer.

The primary issue in these cases is whether an anti-abortion advocate is entitled to a Texas Citizens Participation Act dismissal of defamation claims brought for referring to certain abortion-related organizations as "criminal organizations."

The primary issue in these cases is whether an anti-abortion advocate is entitled to a Texas Citizens Participation Act dismissal of defamation claims brought for referring to certain abortion-related organizations as "criminal organizations."

The issue in this case is, concerning the use of motor-driven equipment, whether negligent use or operation of a floodgate caused flooding damage to homeowners' properties.

This oil-and-gas lease dispute involves what respondents Apollo Exploration, Cogent Exploration, and Sellmoco's rights are under purchase and sale agreements entered into with petitioner Apache Corporation.

The issue in this case is whether modifying an engineering plan without an engineer's statutorily required seal is a discretionary act for which the Texas Department of Transportation retains immunity under the Texas Tort Claims Act.